 |
April 9, 2009 by Ex-member | Reply |
| Smashingly well upadted ranking. You most popular ranking may i note. Well, you couldn't have done it without my help. JK! Lmao. I was jsut reviewing my comments and realized how general, and unhelpful they were. My b. |
 |
February 18, 2009 by Freya | Reply |
| What's Kylie doing on this list..my god..she like 4 foot 1 tall and nips yer brain. |
 |
July 29, 2008 by redleg13 | Reply |
| Given that the 40 something women on this list are part of my generation, I am quite proud that there are so many attractive women on here. The only one missing is Mrs Redleg! Nice job sixpax. |
 |
July 28, 2008 by sixpaxrcool | Reply |
| Overall I am happy with it. I think the askmen.com ratings is a welcomed addition. Unfortunately aprox. 10 candidates do not have ratings. I'm gonna send the editors over there an email with these names and tell them to get crackin' on it asap (Do not like the N/A's) On the DOB... I compromised by printing out the original list. The notes were actually tougher than I expected. The older actresses didn't seem like they had any fun ;) All in all it was a good experience... and I'm quite pleased with the end result. |
 |
July 28, 2008 by harvey* | Reply |
| These are great updates. Seriously. I see you deleted the date of birth column. I realize the reason you added it, so you could easily update their ages. As far as Askmen.com's rating, I must admit they are right in line with my own "sexiness" tastes. Sixpax, how do you like the updates? |
|
July 28, 2008 by redleg13 | Reply |
| I appreciate the back and forth between the members here. I'm glad you all could discuss this with proper respect. That doesn't always happen on this site. |
|
July 26, 2008 by sixpaxrcool | Reply |
| No problem Franky... I understand now. Just so you know I'm taking in all the feedback left by you and Harvey and I'll see if I can put to some good use. We will see what happens my friend. |
|
July 26, 2008 by Ex-member | Reply |
| The only reason why i had the Cite your Sources thing was because i thought it was the only way to leave ANF. I tried it without any of the box checked and it didn't go through. |
|
July 26, 2008 by harvey* | Reply |
| I agree with both of you. I agree with Sixpax that Frankydude's comments need to be more concrete. I also agree with him that Sixpax could stand to add a column describing the physical beauty of each candidate. Does not have to be eye & hair color. Could be "notes." I mean there is a ton of declarations on the internet about all these candidates from a lot of different credible sources whose job it is to judge beauty. This is a Gold Star ranking, but it does not mean it cannot be improved. And this column addition would be a huge improvement. |
|
July 26, 2008 by Ex-member | Reply |
| Still don't know if i agree with you but see where you're coming from. |
|
July 26, 2008 by sixpaxrcool | Reply |
| Now a very interesting point. Hair and eye color. When Originally I was creating this ranking, I had both of these columns but had to abandon them because I could not find conclusive information for the majority of the candidates. With today's age of "beauty products" many candidates frequently change their hair color and eye color (Dye and contact lenses) So on some of the information would be incomplete or "trendy." I do agree with you... those columns would of made a fine addition! |
|
July 26, 2008 by sixpaxrcool | Reply |
| "I used both age and birth for updating purposes. I can look at the DOB and tell when when I need to update the age. IE: July 26 1967. In that same sense I can't expect people to "do the math" when they consider how good each candidate looks for their age. As far as as birth place... I have to disagree with you because people all over Rankopedia are from different states as well as different Countries. Which may help them to relate to a candidate when voting. |
|
July 26, 2008 by Ex-member | Reply |
| Date of birth and age are the same dif. And it's pointless to have place of birth. WHy not some physical features eye color height etc. |
|
July 26, 2008 by sixpaxrcool | Reply |
| With concerns to the negative feedback listed... please specify which columns as suggested were omitted? I will gladly take them into consideration. Also concerning the sources... information was taken from several sources and is not warranted. In the future please include constructive criticism in your ANF's, so members can completely understand the point you are trying make and take appropriate actions. Thank you. |
|
January 29, 2008 by sixpaxrcool | Reply |
| I'll tell you... I actually thought It was going to be difficult to find candidates :) |
 |
January 29, 2008 by matsfan | Reply |
| What a comprehensive list dude. All these girls are amazing. |
|
January 27, 2008 by sixpaxrcool | Reply |
| Thanks everyone... I'm very interested to see how it plays out. |
|
Comments 1 to 25
|
Page:
1
- 2
|
Next
|
You must be registered as a member to leave comments.
|
